Join a wild wolf pack and venture into the wilderness in this innovative 3D computer game. Playing alone or with friends in multiplayer missions, you'll join a wolf pack and hunt, fight, and socialize, all while doing your best to survive.

The WolfQuest experience will go beyond the game with an active online community where you can discuss the game with other players, chat with wolf biologists, and share artwork and stories about wolves.

The first version of the game, WolfQuest: Amethyst Mountain, will be released in December 2007.

On Thursday 31st August we were attempting Emeriss, who had spawned in Seradane.

As we continued to make attempts on Emmeris and as we learnt the mechanics of the fight (this being our first concerted series of attempts on a world dragon) we eventually found ourselves in the unenviable position of being griefed by other members of the alliance faction.

To elaborate further this took the guise of very low level gnome alts in a guild called ‘Mushroom Inc’ who set about constant suicide runs on Emmeris as soon as we had a successful try underway. As I am sure you are aware anyone who is killed by Emmeris become a mushroom spore, and generates an AoE in the area of their own death. Thus someone with ill intent can easily prevent a guild from progressing if they elect to die in the location of the fight, especially if they aim at the main tank, the healers or others.

At the time of the first incident a number of GM tickets were logged, sadly none of these were responded to during the continuation of the griefing activity, which lasted for a further 5 attempts on Emmeris, until the point that we were forced to retire from this rare opportunity due to timing, work commitments, and similar the next day.

At least two people however, to my knowledge, received GM replies the next day (this morning). From the responses provided it is not clear of your exact stance on the issue, nor on the nature of how this will be followed up. It is also disappointing that no further request has been made (yet) for the significant evidence we have gathered to provide proof of our ‘allegations’ and it leaves some wondering if there is any significant intent that this matter be followed up appropriately on the part of Blizzards representatives.

For your ease when accessing logs I include again the names of those involved:

Maxicanmushy Puffshroom
Mushrooman Mushymush
Mushypeas Nomushrooms
Fungi Mushroomed
Mushroomish Mushymain
Cptmushroom Mushroomey
Mushroomtwo Cybershroom


00:40
01.06
01.30

This behaviour continued up until we withdrew, at approximately 2:30am